Which card data encryption methods (e.g. AES-256) are the most resistant to hacking by carders?

[Student]

Various encryption methods and security approaches are used to protect card data from carders (thieves who steal credit and debit card data). It's important to understand that no single encryption method is a panacea — security depends on proper implementation, key management, and a comprehensive security approach. Below is a detailed analysis of the most secure encryption methods and additional measures, with an emphasis on educational aspects, including their cryptographic foundations, strengths and weaknesses, and practical recommendations.

1. AES-256 (Advanced Encryption Standard)​

Description​

AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is a symmetric block cipher algorithm adopted in 2001 by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) as a standard for protecting sensitive data. AES-256 uses a 256-bit key, making it the most secure variant in the AES family (compared to AES-128 and AES-192).

• How it works:
  • Data is divided into blocks of 128 bits.
  • Each block is encrypted using a 256-bit key through a series of rounds (14 for AES-256) involving substitution, permutation, shifts, and key operations.
  • The algorithm uses operating modes (e.g. CBC, GCM) that determine how successive blocks are processed.

Burglary resistance​

• Cryptographic strength:
  • As of 2025, AES-256 has no known practical attacks that could break it if implemented correctly. Even a brute-force attack is impossible due to the huge key space (2^256 combinations).
  • Theoretical attacks such as the related-key attack require unrealistic conditions (e.g. access to many related keys) and are not applicable in real-world scenarios.
• Quantum threats:
  • Grover's algorithm in quantum computing could theoretically reduce the effective key length by half (to 128 bits for AES-256), but this still makes it robust for decades to come, as quantum computers have not yet reached the required power.
• Weaknesses:
  • Vulnerabilities arise not from the algorithm itself, but from implementation errors:
    • Weak or predictable keys (e.g. generated using a poor random number generator).
    • Incorrect use of initialization vector (IV) in modes such as CBC.
    • Key leakage due to weak storage security.
  • Side-channel attacks, such as differential power analysis or timing analysis, can be a threat if the equipment is not protected.

AES operating modes​

• CBC (Cipher Block Chaining):
  • Each data block is XORed with the previous encrypted block before encryption.
  • Requires a random IV for each encryption to avoid predictability.
  • Pros: Widely used, provides privacy.
  • Cons: Does not protect against data tampering (a separate mechanism is required, such as HMAC).
• GCM (Galois/Counter Mode):
  • Combines encryption with authentication (AEAD – Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data).
  • Ensures confidentiality and integrity of data.
  • Pros: Protects against counterfeiting, high performance.
  • Cons: Requires caution with reusing IV (nonce) as repetition may lead to compromise.
• Recommendation: For these cards, GCM is preferred as it provides both encryption and authentication.

Practical recommendations​

• Use proven cryptographic libraries such as OpenSSL, Bouncy Castle, or libsodium to avoid implementation errors.
• Generate keys using certified random number generators (e.g., NIST SP 800-90A compliant).
• Store keys in a secure environment, such as an HSM (Hardware Security Module), to minimize the risk of leakage.
• Rotate keys regularly and use key management systems (e.g. AWS KMS, Google Cloud KMS).
• Encrypt card data on the client side (e.g. in the browser) and transmit it encrypted via TLS (Transport Layer Security).

Application for these cards​

• AES-256 is ideal for encrypting card data while it is stored (e.g. in a database) or transmitted (e.g. between a client and a server).
• Example: The card number is encrypted on the client side using AES-256-GCM, and the encryption key is protected using HSM.

2. Tokenization​

Description​

Tokenization is the process of replacing sensitive data (such as a card number) with a unique identifier (token) that does not contain the original information and cannot be used for transactions without access to the tokenization system.

• How it works:
  • The original card number (PAN - Primary Account Number) is sent to the tokenization system, which returns a token (for example, a random string or a numeric code).
  • The token is stored in the merchant's systems, and the original data is stored in a secure vault accessible only to the payment processor.
  • If necessary, the token can be used to access the original data via a secure API.

Burglary resistance​

• Tokens are useless to carders if they do not have access to the tokenization system.
• Even if the merchant's database is leaked, attackers will only receive tokens that cannot be used to make transactions.
• Stability depends on:
  • Security of the data vault where the original card data is stored.
  • Protecting communication channels between systems (e.g. using TLS).
  • Tokenization system access policy.

Practical recommendations​

• Use PCI DSS-compliant tokenization, which requires that tokens not contain any elements of the original data (for example, the last 4 digits of the card number may be retained for display to the customer, but not the entire number).
• Isolate the tokenization system from other systems to minimize the risk of compromise.
• Use tokenization for all scenarios where card data is not required in clear text (e.g., for recurring payments).

Application for these cards​

• Tokenization is particularly effective for merchants who process recurring payments (such as subscriptions) because it eliminates the need to store card data.
• Example: A payment processor (such as Stripe or PayPal) generates a token for the card number, which is used for subsequent transactions without the need to store the original PAN.

3. Asymmetric encryption (RSA, ECC)​

Description​

Asymmetric encryption uses a pair of keys: a public key (for encryption) and a private key (for decryption). It is often used to protect symmetric encryption keys or to transmit data over insecure channels.

• RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman):
  • Uses large prime numbers and mathematical properties of factorization.
  • The recommended key length is 2048 bits or higher.
• ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography):
  • Based on the mathematics of elliptic curves.
  • Equivalent cryptographic strength is achieved with shorter key lengths (for example, ECC-256 is roughly equivalent to RSA-3072).

Burglary resistance​

• RSA:
  • Resistant to attacks with key lengths of 2048 bits and higher.
  • The main threat is quantum computers (Shor's algorithm can factorize large numbers), but as of 2025 this does not pose a practical threat.
• ETC:
  • More efficient and compact than RSA, with comparable durability.
  • Also vulnerable to quantum attacks, but to a lesser extent than RSA.
• Weaknesses:
  • Vulnerabilities in implementation (e.g. weak random number generator for keys).
  • Side-channel attacks (e.g. runtime analysis).
  • The need for secure storage of the private key.

Practical recommendations​

• Use asymmetric encryption to protect AES keys or to transmit card data over unsecured channels.
• Combine with symmetric encryption: for example, encrypt card data using AES-256 and encrypt the AES key using RSA-2048.
• Update your keys regularly and use trusted cryptographic libraries.

Application for these cards​

• Asymmetric encryption is useful for transmitting card data from client to server or between systems.
• Example: The client encrypts the card number with the public RSA key of the processing center, which decrypts it using the private key.

4. Hashing and HMAC​

Description​

Hashing (e.g., SHA-256, SHA-3) converts data into a fixed-length string that cannot be restored to its original form. HMAC (Hash-based Message Authentication Code) adds a key to ensure authenticity.

• How it works:
  • A hash function (such as SHA-256) creates a unique fingerprint of the data.
  • HMAC combines a hash function with a secret key to verify integrity and authenticity.

Burglary resistance​

• SHA-256 and SHA-3 are resistant to collision and preimage attacks.
• HMAC provides protection against data tampering.
• Weakness: Hashing does not encrypt data, so it is not suitable for storing card data that must be reversible.

Practical recommendations​

• Use HMAC to verify the integrity of transmitted data (for example, in API requests).
• Do not use hashing to store card numbers, as the data must be available for transaction processing.

Application for these cards​

• HMAC can be used to protect transaction metadata or verify the integrity of tokens.
• Example: HMAC-SHA-256 for signing payment authorization requests.

5. Additional protective measures​

To protect card data from carders, encryption and tokenization should be part of a comprehensive security strategy. Here are the key aspects:

PCI DSS Compliance​

• PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a set of requirements for protecting card data.
• Basic requirements:
  • Encryption of data during transmission and storage (e.g. AES-256).
  • Restricting access to card data based on the principle of least privilege.
  • Regular testing of systems for vulnerabilities.
• Failure to comply with PCI DSS may result in fines and data compromise.

End-to-end encryption (E2EE)​

• Card data is encrypted on the client side (e.g. in the browser or application) and remains encrypted until it reaches the processing center.
• Example: Using a JavaScript library to encrypt the card number in the browser before sending it to the server.

Secure key management​

• Store keys in HSM or cloud key management services (AWS KMS, Google Cloud KMS).
• Rotate keys regularly and use access policies.

Multi-factor authentication (MFA)​

• Protect access to systems that store card data with MFA.
• Example: Requiring a password and biometric authentication to access a database.

Monitoring and audit​

• Implement intrusion detection systems (IDS) and suspicious activity monitoring.
• Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing.

Protection against phishing and social engineering​

• Carders often use phishing to gain access to systems or keys.
• Train staff to recognize phishing attacks and implement email-level protection (e.g., DMARC).

6. Threats and how to avoid them​

Technical threats​

• Weak keys: Use certified random number generators (e.g. /dev/urandom on Linux or CryptGenRandom on Windows).
• Implementation Errors: Avoid home-grown cryptographic solutions. Use proven libraries such as OpenSSL or Bouncy Castle.
• Side-channel attacks: Protect equipment from power consumption or timing analysis.
• Quantum Threats: Keep an eye on developments in post-quantum cryptography (e.g., NIST PQC algorithms like CRYSTALS-Kyber).

Organizational threats​

• Data leakage: Restrict access to card data and use tokenization.
• Phishing and social engineering: Conduct regular employee training and implement anti-phishing protection.
• Insider Threats: Implement strict access and monitoring policies.

7. Example of comprehensive protection​

Let's say an online store wants to protect customer card data:

1. On the client side:
   • The card number is encrypted in the browser using the RSA-2048 public key.
   • Encrypted data is transmitted via TLS 1.3 to the server.
2. On the server side:
   • The card data is temporarily decrypted and sent to the tokenization system.
   • The tokenization system returns a token, which is stored in the store's database.
   • Original card data is stored in a secure vault using AES-256-GCM.
3. Key management:
   • AES keys are stored in an HSM and rotated every 6 months.
   • The private RSA key is stored in an isolated system with access via MFA.
4. Monitoring:
   • The monitoring system tracks unauthorized access attempts.
   • Regular audits verify PCI DSS compliance.

8. Conclusion​

The most secure methods for protecting card data from carders:

• AES-256 in GCM or CBC mode with proper key management provides high cryptographic strength for data encryption.
• Tokenization minimizes the risk of data leakage by replacing it with tokens that are useless to attackers.
• Asymmetric encryption (RSA-2048, ECC) is suitable for protecting keys and data transmission.
• HMAC-SHA-256 ensures integrity and authenticity.

For maximum protection, use these methods in combination with additional measures such as PCI DSS, E2EE, HSM, and monitoring. Regularly update systems, monitor new threats (such as the development of quantum computing), and train staff to minimize human error. This approach will ensure a high level of card data security and reduce the risk of attacks by carders.