"Everything under control", or avoidance of emotions - avoidance of life

Lord777

Professional
Messages
2,579
Reaction score
1,511
Points
113
I would like to reflect on how avoiding emotions becomes one of the main tasks of our mind. If such a modality clearly predominates over others, it then becomes a symptom.

We have many different mechanisms for avoiding or evacuating unwanted emotions from the psyche. These mechanisms range from, say, an almost harmless projection of our own negative mental aspects onto external objects and events, and then we tend to condemn something, to such unsafe variations as paranoia, schizophrenia, hallucinations, delusions.

Emotions can be evacuated even into one's own body in the form of psychosomatic diseases, or into a social body in the form of such manifestations as mass aggression, deviation, crime, etc.

It should be repeated that avoidance is a psychic mechanism inherent, of course, in the thinking of any person. But, if this mechanism prevails and unbearable emotional experiences cannot be "digested" properly, they remain in such a "half-baked" form and inevitably settle in the human mind, forming a kind of deposits there.

These raw proto-emotional clots then form the whole variety of mental symptoms: various phobias (if there is a task to avoid meeting with unpleasant knowledge about oneself); obsession (if the main goal is to establish control); hypochondria (if the strategy is to move the emotion to a particular organ or the whole body), and so on.

Different forms of autistic manifestations also serve this purpose - to know nothing about their own sensory experience. Exploring Jose Bleger's concepts of the "agglutinated core" of autism and the provisions of Thomas Ogden's autism-sensory theory about the core of autism help to understand this phenomenon more clearly.

But now let's look at some of the strategies humans use to avoid encountering emotions, or rather their never-metabolized raw precursors.

One of the most “successful” strategies is narcissism.

Take, for example, my patient with a narcissistic personality structure.

He is a middle manager of a large financial group.

During the session, he recounted two dreams.

In the first dream, he overcomes the distance ђ from his home to my office (about a couple of kilometers). He tries to walk strictly in a straight line, while looking down at passers-by. Perhaps he considers himself more educated than them. But then it turns out that the real reason why he strictly follows the chosen course is not to cross the road once again - he is afraid of cars flying towards him, which could run over him.

And if we look at this dream as a message about his emotional state, we can assume that his emotions are endowed with such kinetic force, such power that they can simply "crush" him. Thus, as long as he remains at a distant distance from each dangerous accelerating proto-emotion, he feels safe and sound, retaining the ability to hold the "straight" thread of reasoning.

The second dream is even more interesting. The patient dreams that he is the captain of a galleon, where everything should work perfectly. The crew of the crew constantly checks: whether the sails are perfectly tensioned, whether there are any leaks, etc. Thus, everything is arranged perfectly, and nothing threatens the ship. But the patient's anxiety grows, he believes that if the smallest thing is out of place, a catastrophe will occur. The sails will inevitably break, and even a small leak will lead to the sinking of the ship. To prevent this, he tightens discipline, then comes up with a shameful dismissal, but this is not enough, followed by a military tribunal and even a death sentence.

We can assume that everything in this person's life should be perfect: grades at school, success at work, perfect dinners with friends. And if something is out of place, it will lead to disaster. But why?

Because - and this is the answer we come to with him - any imperfection activates emotions that are difficult to deal with; in other words, it is as if he did not have a command on board (namely in his psychic space) to manage and deal with emergencies - emotional winds or strong waves.

The effort that my patient makes in order to achieve perfection and keep his ship afloat is enormous. But they are simply nothing compared to what he may face if new, strong and unknown emotions are activated, the appearance of which he cannot predict.

I think autistic behavior has the same roots. In autism ⓘ Apparently, we are talking about social autism, and not about autism spectrum disorders, the causes of which may be biological in nature. - Ed. the constancy of every detail, the repetition of every gesture, as well as the miniaturization of emotions ("emotions are bonsai" ⓘBonsai is the Japanese art of growing dwarf trees for decorative purposes, as well as such a tree itself, as one of my patients stated), serve to prevent such the same emotional storms that cannot be dealt with.

And in everyday life, let's see, we usually extinguish all our hot passions in routine, repetition, boredom or intellectualization of that emotional lava that is about to erupt. Why it happens? Yes, just so as not to pull the pin in our emotional grenade.

So, for example, my patient, Carmelo, prefers a routine life with his unloved wife instead of taking the risk and still reaching the Pillars of Hercules, which he dreams of every time he meets an interesting female colleague at work. And now, instead of deciding on a new relationship, he prefers to deal with the already known and safe. He lovingly cares for the domesticated aspects of his own personality and is not ready to go in search of new emotional dimensions.

The strategies that people devise to keep their emotions on a leash are extremely varied. Think about anorexia, for example. We remember that anorexic people think of themselves as fat by being thin. In this case, the unbearable split-off parts of the personality (or proto-emotions) are projected in reverse perspective and remain, as it were, invisible. But they can also be discerned if we use a kind of "binoculars" in which we connect the split psyche and see how weighty and significant this huge gap between real weight and imaginary weight is for anorexic. So, not awareness of reality, but precisely this splitting allows him to paradoxically feel himself whole and intact, but has a destructive effect on his body.

I have always adhered to the belief that this kind of psychoanalytic conclusions can only be drawn in the context of the psychoanalytic situation in the office. However, let me contradict myself based on the opinion of Alessandro Manzoni, who speaks of the incomprehensible nature of that complex fabric called the human heart. So, I believe that various macro-social phenomena also serve the purpose of blocking unwanted emotional states, but already at the level of society.

Take, for example, fanaticism or a religion that guarantees the attainment of truth and the attainment of unbreakable faith and reassurance. Let's think, it's really quite safe to think of yourself as a divine whim without purpose and reason, without all these "before" and "after", without wandering in the dark where it is too scary, where there is physicality, where there are a lot of emotions. Well, religion really is the opium of the people. But remember that in medicine, opium is used to relieve unbearable pain. And the thought that the meaning of life can only be contained in life itself and that there is absolutely nothing in it that would exceed it can cause intolerable emotional suffering that requires consolation.

It seems that society in ancient times intuitively grasped the idea of the need to work with strong emotions, and once it was carried out within the framework of religious practices, but in modern societies, the development of psychoanalysis at the intersection of other sciences offers new opportunities, and each of us can choose the approach that closer to him.
 
How to learn to recognize emotions

Salute, carders, in this article you will learn how to recognize emotions.

Paul Ekman discovered that people of all cultures express feelings in the same way in terms of facial expressions, and discovered micro-movements — short episodes of facial activity that indicate emotions, even when a person tries to hide them.

For a long time, science did not pay any attention to facial expressions. It was first studied by Charles Darwin, who, among other works, published in 1872 the book "On the Expression of Emotions in humans and animals".
The scientist said that facial expressions are universal not only for our species, but also for animals: for example, like dogs, people grin when they are angry.
At the same time, Darwin argued that our gestures, unlike facial expressions, can be called conditional, and was sure that they depend on what culture a person belongs to.

For almost a century, this work of Darwin's remained virtually forgotten.

If it was mentioned in scientific circles, it was only to challenge it. It was only in the 1930s that she was approached by the French neuroanatomist Duchesne de Boulogne, who tried to refute the Nazi scientist's theory that" representatives of the lower races " can be recognized by gestures.

In the 60s, the hypotheses voiced in "On the expression of emotions in humans and animals" and repeatedly mentioned in de Boulon, were popularized by the American psychologist Paul Ekman.

He conducted a series of studies to test this theory, and found out that Charles Darwin was right: in different cultures, gestures do differ, but facial expressions do not.
Ekman's opponents argued that it was all the fault of Hollywood and television, which broadcasts an average image of facial expressions, largely taken as a standard in different countries.

To challenge this assumption, in 1967 and 1968, the scientist studied the facial expressions of representatives of one of the tribes in Papua New Guinea.
These people never had close contact with either Western or Eastern culture and were at a stage of development similar to the Stone Age.
Ekman found that in this case, the main emotions were expressed in the same ways as in the rest of the world.

The "Facial Motion Coding System" (FACS) — a method for classifying human facial expressions, originally developed by Paul Ekman and Wallace Friesen in 1978 and based on a selection of photos with corresponding emotions-proved to be universal. This kind of musical notation for the face still allows you to determine what facial movements a particular emotional expression consists of.

From surprise to contempt: Seven universal emotions

There are only seven emotions that have a universal form of expression:
- surprise;
- fear;
- disgust;
- anger;
- joy;
- sadness;
- contempt.

All of them are encrypted in FACS and EmFACS (updated and expanded versions of the system), so that each emotion can be found and identified by its characteristic features, assessing its intensity and degree of mixing with other feelings. For this purpose, there are basic codes (for example, code 12: "Lip corner lift", large zygomatic muscle), head movement codes, eye movement codes, visibility codes (for example, when the eyebrows are not visible, you need to put code 70) and general behavior codes that allow you to record swallowing, shrugging, shaking, etc.

On our face, there are three areas of the face that can move independently:
- eyebrows and forehead;
- eyes, eyelids and nose bridge;
- lower part of the face: cheeks, mouth, most of the nose and chin.

Each of them has its own traffic pattern in each of the seven cases. For example, when surprised, the eyebrows are raised, the eyes open wide, the jaws open, and then the lips open. Fear looks different: the eyebrows are raised and slightly drawn together; the upper eyelids are also raised, exposing the sclera, the lower eyelids are tense; the mouth is slightly open, and the lips are also slightly tense and drawn back.

In his book, Paul Ekman provides a detailed map of micro-movements for each universal emotion and offers photographs for self-practice. To learn from this book how to quickly identify what feelings are expressed on a human face, you need to find a partner who will show you these photos-completely or covering part of the image with an L-shaped mask. The book also allows you to learn how to determine the degree of expression of emotions and recognize the components of mixed facial expressions: bittersweet sadness, frightened surprise, and so on.

Deceptive expressions: Message control

"It's easier to fake words than facial expressions," writes Paul Ekman. — We were all taught to speak, we all have a fairly large vocabulary and knowledge of grammar rules. There are not only spelling dictionaries, but also encyclopedic ones. You can write the text of your speech in advance. But try to do the same with your facial expression. There is no "dictionary of facial expressions"at your disposal. It's much easier to suppress what you say than what you show."

According to Paul Ekman, a person who lies in the facial expressions of their feelings or in their words usually seeks to satisfy their current need: a pickpocket feigns surprise, an unfaithful husband hides a smile of joy at the sight of a mistress, if a wife is nearby, and so on. "However, the word 'false' does not always correctly represent what is happening in these cases," explains Ekman. — It assumes that the only important message is the message about the true feeling that underlies the false message.

In such cases, there are two messages on the person's face: one reflects the actual feeling, and the other reflects what they want to convey. Paul Ekman first became very interested in this problem when he was confronted with the behavior of patients suffering from severe depression. In conversations with doctors, they claimed (mimically and verbally) that they were happy, but in reality they were trying to get their hospitalization stopped and commit suicide.

The control of a facial message can be different:
- mitigation;
- modulating;
- falsification.

Mitigation usually occurs by adding facial or verbal comments to an existing expression. For example, if an adult is afraid of the dentist, they may wince slightly, adding an element of self-loathing to the fear on their face. Through mitigation, people often communicate to others that they are able to cope with their feelings and make their behavior conform to cultural norms or the current situation.

In the case of modulating, the person adjusts the intensity of the emotion expression, rather than commenting on it. "There are three ways to modulate facial expressions," writes Paul Ekman. — You can change the number of facial areas involved, the duration of expression retention, or the amplitude of facial muscle contraction." As a rule, all three methods are used.

The Physiology of Lying: Place, Time, and Microexpressions

To learn how to recognize lies on faces, you need to pay attention to five aspects:
- morphology of the face (specific configuration of features);
- time characteristics of the emotion (how quickly it occurs and how long it lasts);
- place the expression of emotion on the face;
- microexpressions (they interrupt the main expression);
- social context (if fear is visible on an angry face, you need to think about whether there are objective reasons for this).

People who control their facial expressions tend to pay the most attention to the lower part of their face: the mouth, nose, chin, and cheeks. After all, it is through the mouth that we carry out sound communication, including wordless ones: screams, crying, laughter. But the eyelids and eyebrows often "show" the true feeling-however, the eyebrows are also used for facial falsification, which can affect the appearance of the upper eyelids. What and how exactly is "out of place" in the process of deception depends on what is being broadcast and what is being hidden.

Using Ekman's books, you can learn to recognize different fake facial expressions in different situations: to see frightened eyebrows on a neutral face (which indicates genuine fear), to detect the absence of lower eyelid tension on an angry face (which indicates that anger is fake), to find information about real anger leaking under the mask of disgust, to notice pauses between the verbal message about an emotion and the appearance of its false version on the face (1.5 seconds), and to pay attention to other important details.

But the main skill that Ekman's books and trainings allow you to develop is the recognition of microexpressions. These displays of emotion usually last only a short time: from half to a quarter of a second. You can learn how to find them using the same photos and an L-shaped mask-if the images will quickly replace each other. The presence of microexpressions, however, does not mean that a person does not simultaneously mask, weaken, and neutralize the emotions experienced.

Today, Paul Ekman and his research team conduct emotion recognition trainings for customs, police and border protection employees, HR specialists, and others who often have to search for deception or confirm facts.

However, its developments are useful not only at the border: they can help journalists during interviews, teachers in classes, businessmen in negotiations, and many other people.

However, neither the techniques of Dr. Lightman from the series, nor the techniques of Dr. Ekman, which formed the basis of "Deceive Me", should not be used at home. After all, not every deception actually entails negative consequences — and close people should be given the right to secrecy, since not everything they hide is relevant to us.
 
Top