CarderPlanet
Professional
- Messages
- 2,552
- Reaction score
- 674
- Points
- 83
The most important aspect of work for carders is "interesting work": 82% of all respondents noted it. She managed to push to second place (78%) such a seemingly unshakable factor as "good pay", which is of paramount importance in modern world, where it is important for almost everyone -96%. Carders are much more striving for labor achievements and initiative: the third place among labor values is occupied by the desire for work “where you can achieve something” (60%), and the fifth - the opportunity to take initiative (44%). Similar indicators almost 1.5-2 times less.
An important role is played by a convenient work schedule (58%), and the chosen form of employment allows them to successfully combine their desires with opportunities.
A "safe place of work" is consistently among the top three labor priorities, but the significance of this factor for carders is 2.5 times less - only 34% of respondents consider it important. It is hardly an exaggeration to say that carding is often perceived as a kind of inferior form of employment. However, carders demonstrate a knack for resisting social pressures. The need for work that "commands respect from people" is expressed only by 22% of carders, which is about 1.5 times less than the national indicators. Carders are real workaholics, they are not characterized by the desire for low labor costs. "Not too hard work" attracts only 13% of them, and "long vacation" - 8%. The latter indicator is 4 times less than that of Russians as a whole.
In addition to studying the attitude to work in general, the advantages and disadvantages of carding as a special form of employment were revealed. Almost all the advantages of carding are associated with various manifestations of freedom: first of all, it is a flexible schedule (79%) and the ability to work from home (66%). About half of all respondents choose carding because it gives them the opportunity to choose projects to their liking (54%), take full responsibility for the progress of work (48%)
allows you to combine work with study or work for hire (49%) and does not tie it to a specific workplace (45%). A third of the respondents are satisfied that they do not have to obey corporate rules (34%), there is no bosses and constant control over them (32%). There is also a lack of routine and a variety of work performed (35%).
The disadvantages of free employment are the other side of its merits. The main problems were named the instability and unpredictability of future income (58%) and high risks, the likelihood of fraud on the part of customers (52%). The search for new projects is also an urgent problem (33%), which is not surprising in the conditions of overcrowded highly competitive markets.
In addition, carders are oppressed by the lack of social guarantees (29%), a social package (26%) and legal, documented income (21%), which noticeably infringes on their rights in comparison with traditional, full-time workers. Every fifth of those surveyed by us notes a relatively low level of income and a lack of career growth, career advancement. A noticeable concern is the lack of communication with colleagues (29%). This suggests that the social isolation of e-carders is not a far-fetched issue. It springs from two reasons at once: independent employment status, which implies individual work, and the remote nature of interactions, which minimizes face-to-face communication. The following differences were found for the groups identified by us.
"Future" carders more often than others mention the ability to combine employment with study or employment among the advantages, and among the disadvantages - high risks, the likelihood of fraud on the part of the customer. Since most of these people plan to combine carding with full-time employment and consider it only as an opportunity to generate additional income, such positive aspects as the lack of management and constant control, the absence of the need to obey corporate rules and a relatively high level of income are not so important for them.
Former carders tend to be critical of carding. They are much more likely than others to focus on its shortcomings and pay much less attention to its merits. Based on their answers, we can determine the reasons why these people left free employment. Low income appears to be a key factor for them, as 35% of former carders and only 20% of current carders express dissatisfaction with their earnings. In addition (and this is confirmed by the analysis of labor values), former carders are oppressed by the lack of career opportunities, the need to organize themselves and the monotony of the projects they had to carry out.
In the first place among the shortcomings, as in all other studied groups, is the uncertainty, unpredictability of future income. Accordingly, we can conclude that people who leave carding are more striving for material well-being, stability, career growth and social recognition.
An important role is played by a convenient work schedule (58%), and the chosen form of employment allows them to successfully combine their desires with opportunities.
A "safe place of work" is consistently among the top three labor priorities, but the significance of this factor for carders is 2.5 times less - only 34% of respondents consider it important. It is hardly an exaggeration to say that carding is often perceived as a kind of inferior form of employment. However, carders demonstrate a knack for resisting social pressures. The need for work that "commands respect from people" is expressed only by 22% of carders, which is about 1.5 times less than the national indicators. Carders are real workaholics, they are not characterized by the desire for low labor costs. "Not too hard work" attracts only 13% of them, and "long vacation" - 8%. The latter indicator is 4 times less than that of Russians as a whole.
In addition to studying the attitude to work in general, the advantages and disadvantages of carding as a special form of employment were revealed. Almost all the advantages of carding are associated with various manifestations of freedom: first of all, it is a flexible schedule (79%) and the ability to work from home (66%). About half of all respondents choose carding because it gives them the opportunity to choose projects to their liking (54%), take full responsibility for the progress of work (48%)
allows you to combine work with study or work for hire (49%) and does not tie it to a specific workplace (45%). A third of the respondents are satisfied that they do not have to obey corporate rules (34%), there is no bosses and constant control over them (32%). There is also a lack of routine and a variety of work performed (35%).
The disadvantages of free employment are the other side of its merits. The main problems were named the instability and unpredictability of future income (58%) and high risks, the likelihood of fraud on the part of customers (52%). The search for new projects is also an urgent problem (33%), which is not surprising in the conditions of overcrowded highly competitive markets.
In addition, carders are oppressed by the lack of social guarantees (29%), a social package (26%) and legal, documented income (21%), which noticeably infringes on their rights in comparison with traditional, full-time workers. Every fifth of those surveyed by us notes a relatively low level of income and a lack of career growth, career advancement. A noticeable concern is the lack of communication with colleagues (29%). This suggests that the social isolation of e-carders is not a far-fetched issue. It springs from two reasons at once: independent employment status, which implies individual work, and the remote nature of interactions, which minimizes face-to-face communication. The following differences were found for the groups identified by us.
"Future" carders more often than others mention the ability to combine employment with study or employment among the advantages, and among the disadvantages - high risks, the likelihood of fraud on the part of the customer. Since most of these people plan to combine carding with full-time employment and consider it only as an opportunity to generate additional income, such positive aspects as the lack of management and constant control, the absence of the need to obey corporate rules and a relatively high level of income are not so important for them.
Former carders tend to be critical of carding. They are much more likely than others to focus on its shortcomings and pay much less attention to its merits. Based on their answers, we can determine the reasons why these people left free employment. Low income appears to be a key factor for them, as 35% of former carders and only 20% of current carders express dissatisfaction with their earnings. In addition (and this is confirmed by the analysis of labor values), former carders are oppressed by the lack of career opportunities, the need to organize themselves and the monotony of the projects they had to carry out.
In the first place among the shortcomings, as in all other studied groups, is the uncertainty, unpredictability of future income. Accordingly, we can conclude that people who leave carding are more striving for material well-being, stability, career growth and social recognition.