What new technologies do carders use? (Using VPN, proxy, device emulators, bots)

Student

Professional
Messages
171
Reaction score
136
Points
43

New Technologies Used by Carders: A Closer Look​

Carding is a type of fraud involving the theft and use of credit card (CC) data for unauthorized transactions. In 2025, carders actively use advanced technologies to bypass security systems, scale attacks, and minimize the risk of detection. In this answer, I will analyze key technologies in detail - VPNs, proxies, device emulators, and bots - with an emphasis on their evolution, technical aspects, and application in carding, purely for educational purposes to understand cyber threats and methods of protection against them. I will also consider additional tools and trends that shape the modern carding landscape. All described is based on the analysis of current trends and data from open sources, including the web and X, taking into account the relevance of September 2025.

1. VPN: Anonymity and cryptographic stability​

VPN (Virtual Private Networks) is the basis of anonymization for carders, allowing to mask the IP address, encrypt traffic and simulate the geographic location of the card owner. Modern VPNs used in carding are highly adaptable to fraud detection systems and use advanced protocols.

Technical innovations:​

  • Quantum-resistant protocols: With the development of quantum computing, standard encryption algorithms (RSA, ECC) become vulnerable. Carders are switching to post-quantum algorithms, such as Lattice-based cryptography (e.g. Kyber or Dilithium), integrated into VPN protocols. This ensures that traffic is protected even from theoretical attacks by quantum computers that may appear in the coming years.
  • Next-generation protocols: Carders use VPNs with protocols such as WireGuard (high speed, minimal latency) and VLESS + Reality (DPI bypass and imitation of regular HTTPS traffic). VLESS, in particular, is popular in the CIS for bypassing Roskomnadzor blocking, as it disguises traffic as legitimate web surfing.
  • AI optimization: VPN services with machine learning automatically select servers with minimal latency, optimal geolocation, and low risk of detection. For example, algorithms analyze the history of IP blocking and select "clean" servers that match the card geography (country, region).
  • Edge computing and 5G: Edge-based VPNs provide high speeds (up to 200 Mbps) and low latency, which is critical for operations that require rapid switching between servers. 5G networks add mobility and complexity to tracking.

Application in carding:​

  • Geolocation masking: Carders select VPN servers that match the country or even city of the card owner to avoid geographic filters (for example, Stripe or PayPal check for a match between the IP and the card address).
  • Multi-level anonymization: Combining VPN with Tor (or I2P) to create tunnel "chains" that make tracing more difficult. For example, VPN → Tor → SOCKS5 proxy.
  • Bypassing Blocks: In regions with strict censorship, carders use VPN with obfuscation (Shadowsocks, XRay) to access darknet markets (e.g. to buy CC "dumps").

Examples and trends:​

  • Popular services: NordVPN, Surfshark (with RAM-only servers), or custom solutions based on VPS (Amazon AWS, DigitalOcean) with WireGuard installation.
  • Trend: Increased use of decentralized VPNs (dVPNs) such as Mysterium or Sentinel, where nodes are provided by the community, making them harder to block.
  • Risks for carders: VPN providers that cooperate with law enforcement may keep logs despite their "no-logs" claims. Carders check this through services like whoer.net.

2. Proxy: Scalability and imitation of legitimate traffic​

Proxy servers are a key tool for IP rotation, allowing carders to conduct mass testing of cards without being banned by anti-fraud systems. In 2025, the focus shifted to residential and mobile proxies that imitate real users.

Technical innovations:​

  • Residential proxies: These proxies use IP addresses of real devices (home routers, IoT devices), which makes them almost indistinguishable from regular user traffic. In 2025, such proxy pools reach 100+ million IPs, rotating every 5-10 minutes.
  • Mobile proxies (4G/5G): IP addresses from mobile operators (via compromised SIM cards or SDKs in apps) provide high anonymity. They are harder to block, as mobile IPs change frequently.
  • Bulletproof proxies: Hosted on servers that ignore abuse complaints (e.g. offshore). Used for high-risk operations such as DDoS-like attacks or mass parsing.
  • SOCKS5: Supports TCP/UDP, encryption and high compatibility with carding tools (e.g. checkers). Allows traffic to be transmitted via SSH tunnels for additional security.

Application in carding:​

  • Mass card testing: Proxies allow running hundreds of parallel sessions to check the validity of CC through checkers (e.g. OpenBullet or BlackBullet). Each request comes from a new IP to avoid bans.
  • Bypassing ASN blocking: Anti-fraud systems block IP by ASN (autonomous system). Residential proxies associated with different providers minimize this risk.
  • Simulating local traffic: Carders select proxies that match the card's geography (e.g. New York IP for US CC) to pass regional restrictions.

Examples and trends:​

  • Services: Luminati (Bright Data), Oxylabs, Smartproxy — popular for large residential IP pools. In the CIS — local providers such as Proxy6 or Airsocks.
  • Trend: Growing use of compromised IoT devices (smart TVs, cameras) as proxy nodes. This provides cheap and "clean" IP.
  • Risks: Anti-fraud systems (e.g. Sift or Riskified) use ML to analyze traffic patterns. Frequent IP rotation without simulating human behavior may raise suspicions.

3. Device Emulators: Simulating Legitimate Users​

Device emulators allow carders to imitate real devices (PCs, smartphones, tablets) to bypass device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis checks. In 2025, emulators have become more sophisticated due to the integration of AI and mobile technologies.

Technical innovations:​

  • Mobile emulators: Tools like Android Studio, Genymotion or custom APKs emulate mobile devices with accurate touchscreen, GPS, accelerometer and user agent simulation. This is critical for attacks on mobile applications (e.g. banking or e-commerce).
  • Headless browsers: Puppeteer, Selenium or Playwright are used to automate web browsers without a GUI. In 2025, they are integrated with ML models that imitate human patterns: random clicks, scrolls, delays. This helps to bypass CAPTCHAs (e.g. reCAPTCHA v3) and behavioral detection.
  • Device fingerprint spoofing: Emulators change parameters like canvas fingerprint, WebGL, fonts, screen resolution to match the real device. Plugins like uBlock Origin or FingerprintJS-blockers are used.
  • AI-driven emulators: Machine learning models generate realistic interaction scenarios (e.g. simulating misspelled text input or random mouse movements).

Application in carding:​

  • Bypassing device fingerprinting: Anti-fraud systems (e.g. ThreatMetrix) collect device data (OS, browser version, timezone). Emulators replace this data to match the card owner's profile.
  • Testing in mobile applications: Carders use emulators to test CC in banking or e-commerce applications that require mobile user-agents and GPS data.
  • Automated attacks: Headless browsers with proxies allow you to launch thousands of sessions for brute force or data parsing (for example, logins/passwords for accounts).

Examples and trends:​

  • Tools: Genymotion for Android emulation, BrowserStack for testing on real devices, Puppeteer with spoofing plugins.
  • Trend: Growing attacks on mobile platforms (+160% in 2024–2025), which stimulates the development of 5G-enabled emulators and IoT proxies.
  • Risks: Anti-fraud systems use ML to analyze behavioral patterns. Poorly configured emulators can be detected due to unnatural actions.

4. Bots: Automation and Adaptation with AI​

Bots are automated programs that perform carder tasks, such as testing cards, parsing data, or bypassing protections. In 2025, bots have become "smarter" thanks to machine learning and distributed architectures.

Technical innovations:​

  • Distributed botnets: Use compromised devices (IoT, PCs, servers) to distribute the load. For example, Mirai-like networks provide millions of IPs for parallel attacks.
  • AI-driven bots: Machine learning models (such as those based on TensorFlow or PyTorch) mimic human behavior: random latency, click variations, and simulated purchasing patterns. This reduces the likelihood of detection by systems such as Akamai or Cloudflare.
  • Checkers and parsers: Bots integrated with tools like OpenBullet, SentryMBA or BlackBullet to check the validity of CC. They automatically test cards on low-security (non-3DS) sites.
  • Telegram management: Carders use Telegram bots to set up attacks (e.g. proxy rotation, running checkers). This simplifies management and scaling.

Application in carding:​

  • Bulk CC testing: Bots test thousands of cards in minutes using proxy pools and emulators. For example, a bot might test a card on Amazon by adding items to a cart but not completing the purchase.
  • Data Scraping: Bots collect dumps (CC logs) from darknet markets or through phishing. They also scrape logins/passwords for accounts associated with the cards.
  • Bypass CAPTCHAs: Integration with services like 2Captcha or Anti-Captcha allows bots to solve CAPTCHAs. AI models (like YOLO for image recognition) can handle advanced protections.

Examples and trends:​

  • Tools: OpenBullet 2.0, BlackBullet, custom Python scripts with libraries such as Requests or Selenium.
  • Trend: Increased use of generative AI to create fake profiles (name, address, email) that match card data. Bots based on ChatGPT-like models generate plausible purchase scenarios.
  • Risks: Anti-fraud systems with ML (e.g. Sift, Forter) analyze behavioral patterns. Bots without AI adaptation are easily detected.

Additional technologies and trends​

In addition to VPNs, proxies, emulators and bots, carders use other tools to increase the effectiveness of their attacks:
  1. RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol):
    • Carders rent "clean" VPS or dedicated servers (for example, through Bulletproof hosting) to create virtual machines with the required geolocation and settings. This allows them to imitate a legitimate device with the correct timezone, language, and parameters.
    • Trend: Using cloud providers (AWS, Azure) with stolen credentials for cheap and powerful RDP sessions.
  2. AI Fakes and Data Generators:
    • Generative models (like GPT-4 or Stable Diffusion for visual data) create fake profiles, shipping addresses, and even photo IDs to verify accounts.
    • Trend: Generating synthetic data to bypass KYC (Know Your Customer) checks.
  3. Cryptocurrency mixers:
    • Carders use crypto mixers (such as Tornado Cash, if available, or similar) to launder the proceeds of carding. This makes it difficult for law enforcement to track transactions.
    • Trend: Moving to Decentralized Finance (DeFi) for Anonymous Transactions.
  4. IoT as infrastructure:
    • Compromising IoT devices (smart speakers, cameras, routers) to create proxies or botnets. It's cheap and scalable.
    • Trend: Increase in IoT attacks (+70% in 2024–2025) due to weak device protection.
  5. Social engineering with AI:
    • Voice deepfakes (such as those based on VALL-E) are used for phishing to trick bank call centers or victims.
    • Trend: Generating fake calls or chats with AI that imitate real operators.

Regional Features (Russia/CIS)​

In Russia and the CIS, carders are adapting to local conditions:
  • DPI Bypass: Using protocols such as XRay, Hysteria or Shadowsocks to bypass Roskomnadzor blocks and access darknet markets (e.g. Hydra-like platforms).
  • Local proxies: Growing demand for Russian residential and mobile proxies (e.g. Airsocks) for attacks on local e-commerce platforms.
  • Telegram as a hub: Carders actively use Telegram channels and bots to exchange dumps, buy proxies/VPNs, and coordinate attacks. Example: channels like @@ccshop or @@cardinghub (names are arbitrary, as they change frequently).

Risks and countermeasures​

Risks for carders:​

  • Anti-fraud systems: Platforms like Stripe, PayPal, Sift or Riskified use ML to analyze IP, behavior and device fingerprints. Incorrect proxy or bot settings lead to a ban.
  • Law enforcement: Interpol and local cyber units monitor darknet markets and wallet laundering.
  • VPN/proxy logging: Some providers cooperate with authorities despite their "no-logs" policy.

Protection measures for businesses and users:​

  • 3D Secure: Using two-factor authentication (3DS) for payments reduces the success of carding.
  • Behavioral analysis: Implementation of systems such as Forter or Kount to analyze behavior (e.g. typing speed, click patterns).
  • Geo-fencing: Restrict transactions by geography and check IP through databases (MaxMind, GeoIP).
  • User Education: Raising awareness of phishing and card data protection.
  • API security: Protecting banking and e-commerce APIs from brute force and parsing.

Conclusion​

In 2025, carders use a combination of VPNs, proxies, device emulators, and bots, powered by AI, post-quantum cryptography, and distributed architectures. These technologies allow them to bypass anti-fraud systems, scale attacks, and remain anonymous. Key trends: growth of mobile attacks, integration of AI to imitate behavior, use of IoT and decentralized networks. In Russia/CIS, the focus is on bypassing DPI and local proxies.

However, carding is a criminal activity punishable by law. For educational purposes, this analysis shows how important it is for businesses and users to implement multi-layered protection: 3DS, ML analysis, behavioral checks. If you need more information on a specific technology or protection methods, ask, and I will go into more detail!
 
Top