Web Audio API FFT Windowing Artifacts: How Transformation Algorithms Reveal to the Browser

[BadB]

Microscopic differences in FFT implementation between Chrome, Firefox, and Safari

Introduction: The Silence That Says It All​

You've muted your microphone. You're not playing music. You're not even visiting websites with audio.
But you're instantly blocked.
The reason? The Web Audio API —a technology that silently generates audio signals in the background to perform a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and measure microscopic window function artifacts.

These artifacts are the result of differences in FFT implementations across browsers:

• Chrome uses KissFFT,
• Firefox — FFmpeg,
• Safari — Accelerate Framework.

And it's these differences that create a unique fingerprint that can't be faked.

In this article, we'll provide an in-depth technical analysis of how FFT Windowing works in the Web Audio API, why browser artifacts are present, and how even silence can reveal your stack.

Part 1: What is FFT Windowing in the Web Audio API?​

Technical definition​

FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) is an algorithm for transforming a signal from the time domain to the frequency domain.
Windowing is the application of a window function (e.g., Hann or Hamming) to reduce spectral leakage.

In the Web Audio API:

const analyzer = audioContext.createAnalyser();
analyzer.fftSize = 2048;
analyzer.windowing = 'hann'; // Implicitly applied

Key fact:
Each browser uses its own FFT algorithm and its own window function implementation, which creates unique artifacts.

Part 2: Differences in FFT Implementation by Browser​

Sales Table (2026)​

Browser	FFT Library	Window function	Accuracy
Chrome (Chromium)	KissFFT	He	±0.0001%
Firefox	FFmpeg	Hamming	±0.0003%
Safari	Accelerate	Blackman-Harris	±0.00005%

Anomaly example:
You claim Chrome 125, but the artifacts match Blackman-Harris → the system sees: "This is Safari" → fraud score = 95+

Part 3: How Window Function Artifacts Expose the Browser​

Spectral leakage analysis​

When the Web Audio API applies a window function, characteristic artifacts occur:

• Hann window (Chrome): smooth attenuation, low side lobes,
• Hamming window (Firefox): sharper attenuation, higher side lobes,
• Blackman-Harris (Safari): minimal leakage, but more difficult to calculate.

These differences are manifested in:

• Side lobe amplitude,
• Phase shifts,
• Peak frequency accuracy.

Entropy:
The combination of artifacts gives an entropy of 15–18 bits → 1 in 260,000

Part 4: How Fraud Engines Use FFT Artifacts​

Analysis process (Forter, Sift)​

Step 1: Generate a test signal

const ctx = new AudioContext();
const osc = ctx.createOscillator();
const analyzer = ctx.createAnalyser();

osc.frequency.value = 440; // Pure sine wave
osc.connect(analyzer);
analyzer.fftSize = 2048;

Step 2: Spectrum Analysis

• The system measures the amplitude at frequencies of 438, 439, 440, 441, 442 Hz,
• Compares with reference profiles:
  • Chrome: sidelobes = -42 dB,
  • Firefox: sidelobes = -38 dB,
  • Safari: sidelobes = -52 dB.

Step 3: Assigning a Trust Score

• Match: low fraud score,
• Mismatch: high fraud score.

Browser identification accuracy by FFT artifacts: 96% (according to Cloudflare, Q1 2026).

Part 5: How to Test Your Vulnerabilities​

Step 1: Use test sites​

• https://browserleaks.com/audio — shows FFT artifacts,
• https://amiunique.org — detailed analysis.

Step 2: Run a local test​

function measureFFTAartifacts() { 
const ctx = new (window.AudioContext || window.webkitAudioContext)(); 
const osc = ctx.createOscillator(); 
const analyzer = ctx.createAnalyser(); 

analyzer.fftSize = 2048; 
osc.frequency.value = 440; 
osc.connect(analyzer); 

const buffer = new Float32Array(analyser.frequencyBinCount); 
analyzer.getFloatFrequencyData(buffer); 

//Measure side lobes 
const peakIndex = 440 * analyzer.frequencyBinCount / ctx.sampleRate; 
const sideLobe = buffer[Math.floor(peakIndex) - 2]; // 438 Hz

console.log('Side lobe amplitude:', sideLobe, 'dB');

if (sideLobe > -40) console.log('→ Firefox');
else if (sideLobe > -45) console.log('→ Chrome');
else console.log('→ Safari');
}
measureFFTAartifacts();

Rule:
If the artifacts do not match the declared browser → you have already been issued.

Part 6: How to Protect Against FFT Artifacts​

Browser level​

Firefox

1. Enter about:config,
2. Find:
   • dom.webaudio.enabled → false.

Chrome / Chromium

• There is no built-in way to disable Web Audio,
• Use anti-detect browsers.

Dolphin Anty

1. When creating a profile,
2. In the Audio section,
3. Select: "Disable Web Audio API".

The hard truth:
Disabling the Web Audio API is the only reliable protection.
FFT artifacts cannot be spoofed.

Part 7: Why Most Carders Fail​

Common Mistakes​

Error	Consequence
Ignoring the Web Audio API	They think the microphone is the most important thing → failure
Using Safari on Windows	Artifacts don't match → anomaly
Mute only the microphone	Web Audio works without a microphone → leak

Field data (2026):
75% of failures are due to Web Audio API FFT Artifacts, even with a perfect Canvas.

Part 8: Practical Guide - Secure Profile​

Step 1: Set up RDP​

• Install Windows 10 Pro on bare metal (Hetzner AX41),
• Use official Chrome 125.

Step 2: Disable the Web Audio API​

• В Dolphin Anty → Disable Web Audio API,
• Check it out at browserleaks.com/audio

Step 3: Automate the check​

• Add the Web Audio test script to the beginning of each session,
• If artifacts are found, stop the operation immediately.

Result:
Complete absence of FFT artifacts → low fraud score.

Conclusion: The Algorithm is a New Fingerprint​

The Web Audio API FFT Windowing Artifacts isn't just "another API". It's a mathematical fingerprint of your browser that no browser antidetection can hide.

Final thought:
True anonymity doesn't start with turning off your microphone, but with understanding that even silence has a spectrum.
Because in a world of fraud, even an algorithm can give you away.

Stay technically accurate. Stay at the browser level.
And remember: in the world of security, math is identity.