jiremoon74366
Member
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Hello, friends.
Probably, you, like me, have often thought about increasing the response efficiency of drop projects or scam sites. After all, the response efficiency has fallen sharply lately. But don’t despair, there is a solution!
Having spent the last few years on numerous trials and tests, I have derived for myself a good and, in my opinion, completely obvious formula for success in this matter. In this article, I will tell you everything in detail and numbers.
Let’s put ourselves in the place of the average drop in our time of abundant scams and similar scams. For example, I would first of all look at:
And only then would I carefully read what they offer me.
And in the vast majority of cases, if all the stars are aligned, our potential "client" will enthusiastically agree to our terms, despite the fact that there are some inconvenient moments in our terms and small fears.
The company's trust outweighs in most of these cases, and people begin to hope for a better outcome.
The reason for the trust is also hidden in the fact that to this day the number of such trust companies that have not lived up to expectations is extremely small, and yet in the vast majority of cases it is fresh registrants who are cheated, without trust and reviews. There are even separate sections and a bunch of communities on the Internet devoted to this, how to identify bad companies and how not to become a victim of scammers. Therefore, trust in our business is everything.
Well, let's talk about numbers, since you can write anything you want, but how does it work in practice?
My tests involved 12 sites, let's call them projects, because they weren't just sites ))
The tests were divided into 2 stages, in the first stage I did the following:
To avoid any doubts about the quality of the projects, I will immediately stipulate that each project contained:
And, of course, the companies themselves were real, actual, which I registered according to all the rules of the US tax system (all forms were submitted, licenses were obtained, etc.).
I also wrote all the necessary documentation and instructions for future drops.
After everything was ready, I had to ask friends to exchange future drops for traffic))
After all, it was necessary to test somehow, and the projects were not commercial.
And, of course, I had to ask friends to make calls.
So, the response came, the calls are ready, we launch the tests.
As a result, I got the following picture:
For each type of project (stuff and cashing out), 1k of response was drained for each project (3k went to stuff and 3k to cashing out).
Stuff (from 1k response):
Cash-out-biz (from 1k response):
The efficiency of cashing out was lower, but that's because I took the hardest projects - biz, where the drop was required to open a company with business accounts. In such projects, the efficiency is much lower than for characters.
Two weeks later, after a short break, the second phase of testing came.
At this stage, I took the sites I had just written for stuff and cashing out biz. The only difference was that:
So, now we launch tests on freshly registered projects with a scam smell))
Everything is as written in the scam textbooks))
And here are the results:
Stuff (from 1k response):
Cash-out-biz (from 1k response):
This time the results were quite sad, which was to be expected, in principle.
After talking with friends later, I found out that in the first case, when I used my trust projects, almost all drops successfully worked out their cycle with rare exceptions. And in the second case, even those pitiful tears from the drops that were received, in almost half of the cases let down their owners.
Draw your own conclusions about what works better and how you need to do your projects so that they bring you truly good results.
Probably, you, like me, have often thought about increasing the response efficiency of drop projects or scam sites. After all, the response efficiency has fallen sharply lately. But don’t despair, there is a solution!
Having spent the last few years on numerous trials and tests, I have derived for myself a good and, in my opinion, completely obvious formula for success in this matter. In this article, I will tell you everything in detail and numbers.
Let’s put ourselves in the place of the average drop in our time of abundant scams and similar scams. For example, I would first of all look at:
- Having reviews on Google and social networks (very relevant now)
- The presence of the company itself in search engines
- I would also check if such a company even exists.
- And how long has this company been operating on the market?
And only then would I carefully read what they offer me.
And in the vast majority of cases, if all the stars are aligned, our potential "client" will enthusiastically agree to our terms, despite the fact that there are some inconvenient moments in our terms and small fears.
The company's trust outweighs in most of these cases, and people begin to hope for a better outcome.
The reason for the trust is also hidden in the fact that to this day the number of such trust companies that have not lived up to expectations is extremely small, and yet in the vast majority of cases it is fresh registrants who are cheated, without trust and reviews. There are even separate sections and a bunch of communities on the Internet devoted to this, how to identify bad companies and how not to become a victim of scammers. Therefore, trust in our business is everything.
Well, let's talk about numbers, since you can write anything you want, but how does it work in practice?
My tests involved 12 sites, let's call them projects, because they weren't just sites ))
The tests were divided into 2 stages, in the first stage I did the following:
- I took my old 3 sites (these were projects I wrote for stuff)
- And the remaining 3 are projects for cashing out
To avoid any doubts about the quality of the projects, I will immediately stipulate that each project contained:
- a unique idea
- unique design
- content management system (CRM)
- very old domain
- admin panel for drops
And, of course, the companies themselves were real, actual, which I registered according to all the rules of the US tax system (all forms were submitted, licenses were obtained, etc.).
I also wrote all the necessary documentation and instructions for future drops.
After everything was ready, I had to ask friends to exchange future drops for traffic))
After all, it was necessary to test somehow, and the projects were not commercial.
And, of course, I had to ask friends to make calls.
So, the response came, the calls are ready, we launch the tests.
As a result, I got the following picture:
For each type of project (stuff and cashing out), 1k of response was drained for each project (3k went to stuff and 3k to cashing out).
Stuff (from 1k response):
- 1st project: 30 people sent documents, but after screening only 13 people remained.
- 2nd project: 26 people sent documents, but after screening only 10 people remained.
- 3rd project: 42 people sent documents, but after screening only 19 people remained.
Cash-out-biz (from 1k response):
- 1st project: 22 people sent documents, but after screening only 6 people remained.
- 2nd project: 27 people sent documents, but after screening only 7 people remained.
- 3rd project: 25 people sent documents, but after screening only 10 people remained.
The efficiency of cashing out was lower, but that's because I took the hardest projects - biz, where the drop was required to open a company with business accounts. In such projects, the efficiency is much lower than for characters.
Two weeks later, after a short break, the second phase of testing came.
At this stage, I took the sites I had just written for stuff and cashing out biz. The only difference was that:
- the domain was fresh
- the company was fictitious
- the company was not on the internet
- social networks were fresh, but with a fake signature
So, now we launch tests on freshly registered projects with a scam smell))
Everything is as written in the scam textbooks))
And here are the results:
Stuff (from 1k response):
- 1st project: 15 people sent documents, but after screening only 2 people remained.
- 2nd project: 13 people sent documents, but after screening only 2 people remained.
- 3rd project: 20 people sent documents, but after screening only 5 people remained.
Cash-out-biz (from 1k response):
- 1st project: 8 people sent documents, but after screening, 0 people remained.
- 2nd project: 11 people sent documents, but after screening only 1 person remained.
- 3rd project: 18 people sent documents, but after the selection process only 2 people remained.
This time the results were quite sad, which was to be expected, in principle.
After talking with friends later, I found out that in the first case, when I used my trust projects, almost all drops successfully worked out their cycle with rare exceptions. And in the second case, even those pitiful tears from the drops that were received, in almost half of the cases let down their owners.
Draw your own conclusions about what works better and how you need to do your projects so that they bring you truly good results.
