Jollier
Professional
- Messages
- 1,197
- Reaction score
- 1,272
- Points
- 113
Banks employ sophisticated fraud detection mechanisms to trace and mitigate risks associated with stolen cards, with BIN lookup and geo-velocity checks being two critical components. Here's a structured breakdown of how these systems work:
1. BIN Lookup (Bank Identification Number)
- What is a BIN?
The BIN is the first 6–8 digits of a payment card number, identifying the issuing bank, card type (credit, debit, prepaid), and the country of issuance. - Purpose in Fraud Detection:
- Issuer Identification: When a transaction occurs, the BIN is cross-referenced with a BIN database to confirm the issuing bank and card details.
- Geographic Red Flags: If the transaction location conflicts with the card’s issuing country (e.g., a U.S.-issued card used in Nigeria), it raises suspicion.
- Card Type Analysis: Prepaid or high-risk BINs may trigger additional scrutiny.
- Merchant Risk Assessment: BINs linked to compromised issuers or regions with higher fraud rates are flagged.
- Example: A transaction from a BIN associated with a known fraud hotspot (e.g., certain BINs from Nigeria or Ghana) may be blocked automatically.
2. Geo-Velocity Checks
- Definition:
Geo-velocity analyzes the geographic location and timing of transactions to detect impossible movement patterns. - How It Works:
- Location Data Sources:
- In-person transactions: Merchant terminal location (GPS, IP address).
- Online transactions: Cardholder’s billing address, IP geolocation, or device GPS.
- Velocity Rules:
- If two transactions occur in geographically distant locations within a short timeframe (e.g., New York at 10 AM and London at 11 AM), the system flags it as impossible for the cardholder to travel.
- Sudden shifts to high-risk countries (e.g., from Canada to Russia) may trigger alerts.
- Behavioral Context:
- Systems adapt to the cardholder’s travel history. Frequent travelers may have relaxed thresholds, while sudden international transactions from non-travelers raise alarms.
- Location Data Sources:
- Real-Time Action: Fraudulent transactions are declined, and the cardholder is notified for verification.
3. Integration with Broader Fraud Detection Systems
- Machine Learning Models:
Banks combine BIN and geo-velocity data with other factors (e.g., transaction amount, merchant category, device fingerprinting) to build risk scores. - Collaborative Networks:
Financial institutions share BIN fraud data through networks like Visa’s BIN Monitor or Mastercard’s Safety Net to identify systemic breaches. - Post-Fraud Tracing:
- If fraud is confirmed, banks collaborate with acquirers (merchant banks) to retrieve transaction details (e.g., IP addresses, merchant IDs).
- Law enforcement may trace counterfeit card production or phishing operations linked to the compromised BINs.
4. Limitations and Challenges
- False Positives: Legitimate travel or cross-border online purchases can trigger unnecessary blocks.
- Data Accuracy: Outdated BIN databases may misidentify issuers or regions.
- Evolving Tactics: Fraudsters use techniques like IP spoofing or "card testing" (small purchases to validate stolen cards) to bypass systems.
5. Practical Example of Fraud Detection
- A cardholder’s card is stolen in the U.S.
- The thief uses it in Brazil, where the BIN lookup reveals the card was issued in the U.S. (normal) but the geo-velocity check detects a transaction in São Paulo 2 hours after a New York purchase.
- The system declines the transaction, alerts the bank, and notifies the cardholder.
- The bank freezes the card, investigates, and traces the fraudulent transaction to a compromised online merchant.