Lord777
Professional
- Messages
- 2,577
- Reaction score
- 1,563
- Points
- 113
The fate of the mass surveillance program is in the hands of lawmakers.
In a Senate briefing last week, a federal counterterrorism official cited the example of the October 7 Hamas attack, calling on Congress to extend a massive and controversial surveillance program that has been repeatedly used to spy on U.S. citizens inside the country.
Christine Abizaid, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, addressed the Senate Homeland Security Committee, arguing that "in light of the events of last month, the terrorist threat is constantly changing, and our country needs to maintain the foundations [of counterterrorism] to ensure constant vigilance." She noted that Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows the U.S. government to collect vast amounts of intelligence, including data on U.S. citizens, without first obtaining a search warrant.
The controversial program is set to end at the end of the year, and lawmakers sympathetic to the intelligence community are rushing to defend it. At the same time, some members of Congress, such as Senator Ron Wyden, are pushing for reforms that would limit the government's surveillance capabilities.
The Secret Surveillance for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Act ( FISA ), passed in 1978, received a significant expansion of its powers after the tragedy of September 11. This expansion has strengthened the surveillance capabilities of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Initially, the law was intended to collect data on foreign agents and organizations, but it also made it possible to conduct surveillance of American citizens who come into contact with foreigners, which raises concerns about protecting privacy and civil liberties.
This loophole in the law opens the door for federal agencies to monitor large groups of the American population, which has long been criticized by civil liberties advocates as a clear violation of citizens rights. Due to the numerous cases of abuse of the powers granted by Article 702, even the intelligence advisory council under President Joe Biden proposed to impose restrictions on the use of these powers by the FBI to conduct investigations against US citizens.
The Brennan Center for Justice released a document last month noting that the FBI used Article 702 powers to spy on U.S. representatives and senators, civil liberties organizations, political campaigns, and activists. Civil liberties advocates have proposed various reforms to the article, including restrictions on the types of communications the FBI can search, introducing strict warrant requirements to restrict FISA searches, and ending a loophole that allows federal agencies to spy on Americans by buying data from private brokers.
Abizaid's statements to the Senate Homeland Security Committee followed similar appeals from FBI Director Christopher Wray and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who also spoke at the hearing. The push to expand the government's surveillance powers comes as elected officials are calling for an investigation of pro-Palestinian groups, which has drawn condemnation from numerous civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union.
In Virginia, the Attorney General launched an investigation into the fundraising activities of the nonprofit Muslim Americans for Palestine, including allegations of supporting Hamas, a designated terrorist group. The organization called the investigation a dangerous and unfounded slander.
Meanwhile, in Congress, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution condemning students who support Palestine on college campuses. Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, has asked the Justice Department to investigate student groups at various universities that witnessed large gatherings protesting the war in Gaza. "There is a long and sordid history of supposedly independent 'human rights' groups operating in America with long — standing ties to foreign terrorist organizations," Hawley wrote. "It is quite possible that many of these student organizations are entangled in similar networks at one level or another — either as recipients of funding from these attackers, or as its channels."
The ACLU criticized the efforts of Hawley and others in an open letter. "The general call to investigate every branch of a pro-Palestinian student group for "material support for terrorists — even without trying to provide evidence — is unfounded, wrong and dangerous. This repeats America's mistakes in the McCarthy era and is counterproductive. We call on college and university leaders to firmly adhere to the best traditions of our country and reject proposals to restrict the freedom of speech protected by the constitution."
In a Senate briefing last week, a federal counterterrorism official cited the example of the October 7 Hamas attack, calling on Congress to extend a massive and controversial surveillance program that has been repeatedly used to spy on U.S. citizens inside the country.
Christine Abizaid, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, addressed the Senate Homeland Security Committee, arguing that "in light of the events of last month, the terrorist threat is constantly changing, and our country needs to maintain the foundations [of counterterrorism] to ensure constant vigilance." She noted that Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows the U.S. government to collect vast amounts of intelligence, including data on U.S. citizens, without first obtaining a search warrant.
The controversial program is set to end at the end of the year, and lawmakers sympathetic to the intelligence community are rushing to defend it. At the same time, some members of Congress, such as Senator Ron Wyden, are pushing for reforms that would limit the government's surveillance capabilities.
The Secret Surveillance for Foreign Intelligence Purposes Act ( FISA ), passed in 1978, received a significant expansion of its powers after the tragedy of September 11. This expansion has strengthened the surveillance capabilities of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Initially, the law was intended to collect data on foreign agents and organizations, but it also made it possible to conduct surveillance of American citizens who come into contact with foreigners, which raises concerns about protecting privacy and civil liberties.
This loophole in the law opens the door for federal agencies to monitor large groups of the American population, which has long been criticized by civil liberties advocates as a clear violation of citizens rights. Due to the numerous cases of abuse of the powers granted by Article 702, even the intelligence advisory council under President Joe Biden proposed to impose restrictions on the use of these powers by the FBI to conduct investigations against US citizens.
The Brennan Center for Justice released a document last month noting that the FBI used Article 702 powers to spy on U.S. representatives and senators, civil liberties organizations, political campaigns, and activists. Civil liberties advocates have proposed various reforms to the article, including restrictions on the types of communications the FBI can search, introducing strict warrant requirements to restrict FISA searches, and ending a loophole that allows federal agencies to spy on Americans by buying data from private brokers.
Abizaid's statements to the Senate Homeland Security Committee followed similar appeals from FBI Director Christopher Wray and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who also spoke at the hearing. The push to expand the government's surveillance powers comes as elected officials are calling for an investigation of pro-Palestinian groups, which has drawn condemnation from numerous civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union.
In Virginia, the Attorney General launched an investigation into the fundraising activities of the nonprofit Muslim Americans for Palestine, including allegations of supporting Hamas, a designated terrorist group. The organization called the investigation a dangerous and unfounded slander.
Meanwhile, in Congress, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution condemning students who support Palestine on college campuses. Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, has asked the Justice Department to investigate student groups at various universities that witnessed large gatherings protesting the war in Gaza. "There is a long and sordid history of supposedly independent 'human rights' groups operating in America with long — standing ties to foreign terrorist organizations," Hawley wrote. "It is quite possible that many of these student organizations are entangled in similar networks at one level or another — either as recipients of funding from these attackers, or as its channels."
The ACLU criticized the efforts of Hawley and others in an open letter. "The general call to investigate every branch of a pro-Palestinian student group for "material support for terrorists — even without trying to provide evidence — is unfounded, wrong and dangerous. This repeats America's mistakes in the McCarthy era and is counterproductive. We call on college and university leaders to firmly adhere to the best traditions of our country and reject proposals to restrict the freedom of speech protected by the constitution."
