Favorites of carders

[chushpan]

Carders, as participants in illegal activities, face many enemies who actively fight their actions. These "favorites" include not only law enforcement agencies, but also technology companies, banks, cybersecurity specialists, and even other carders. Let's consider the main opponents of carders and their role in the fight against fraud.

1. Law enforcement agencies​

1.1 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)​

• The FBI is actively investigating carding cases:
  • Tracking transactions through the darknet.
  • Arrests of gang leaders.
  • Closing forums and marketplaces.

1.2. US Secret Service​

• Specializes in protecting financial systems:
  • Combating card data theft.
  • International cooperation to identify criminals.

1.3. Interpol​

• Coordinates efforts between countries:
  • Exchange of information about suspects.
  • Joint operations against international groups.

1.4. Local law enforcement​

• Police and investigative bodies in different countries:
  • Investigation of local fraud cases.
  • Confiscation of equipment and money.

2. Banks and financial institutions​

2.1. Data protection​

• Banks are implementing security systems:
  • Multi-factor authentication.
  • Blocking suspicious transactions.

2.2. Cooperation with law enforcement officers​

• Banks provide information on suspicious transactions:
  • Transaction analysis.
  • Detecting stolen cards.

2.3. Compensation for damages​

• Banks strive to minimize customer losses:
  • Return of stolen funds.
  • Strengthening protective measures.

3. Cybersecurity and IT companies​

3.1. Antivirus developers​

• Companies are creating tools to protect users:
  • Detection of malware (e.g. stealers).
  • Blocking phishing sites.

3.2. Payment systems​

• Visa, Mastercard, PayPal and other companies fight fraud:
  • Monitoring suspicious transactions.
  • Blocking stolen cards.

3.3 Cybersecurity Researchers​

• Experts identify vulnerabilities in systems:
  • Publishing reports on new attack methods.
  • Developing solutions to prevent them.

4. Technology companies​

4.1. Internet providers​

• Blocking access to the darknet and criminal resources:
  • Servers are being shut down.
  • IP address tracking.

4.2. Cryptography Developers​

• Creation of new encryption algorithms:
  • Protecting card data.
  • Preventing hacks.

4.3. Social networks​

• Deleting accounts associated with fraud:
  • Telegram, Discord, Facebook.
  • Blocking skimmer and phishing ads.

5. Other carders​

5.1. Competition​

• Carders often conflict with each other:
  • The fight for the best "tools" and data.
  • Betrayal for one's own gain.

5.2. Scammers among carders​

• Some community members are deceiving their colleagues:
  • Selling non-working data.
  • Stealing money from other carders.

5.3. "Informers"​

• Informants working with law enforcement:
  • Transfer of grouping data.
  • Assistance in solving crimes.

6. Users and society​

6.1 Raising awareness​

• People are learning to protect their data:
  • Using complex passwords.
  • Be careful when clicking on links.

6.2. Reporting Suspicious Activity​

• Users help identify scammers:
  • Phishing site reports.
  • Notifications about suspicious transactions.

6.3. Public condemnation​

• Carding is perceived as an immoral activity:
  • Criticism from society.
  • Pressure on those involved in crimes.

7. Legislative bodies​

7.1. Tightening of laws​

• Introduction of new regulations to combat carding:
  • Increase in prison terms.
  • Fines for using stolen data.

7.2. Darknet regulation​

• Attempts to close or restrict access to underground markets:
  • Blocking websites.
  • Tracking cryptocurrency transactions.

7.3. International agreements​

• Creation of a unified database of cybercriminals:
  • Extradition of criminals.
  • Joint investigations.

8. Victims of carding​

8.1. Financial losses​

• People who have lost money become active opponents of carders:
  • Filing complaints with banks.
  • Participation in investigations.

8.2. Psychological impact​

• Victims of fraudsters can become supporters of the fight against carding:
  • Teaching others methods of protection.
  • Public stories about their losses.

Conclusion​

Carders face a variety of enemies that actively oppose their activities. These include law enforcement, banks, tech companies, cybersecurity specialists, and even users themselves. While carders are constantly adapting to new challenges, the pressure from these adversaries increases the risk of exposure.

Key takeaway: The best way to combat carding is a comprehensive approach that includes technology, legislation, and public awareness. Only by working together will the threats from cybercrime be minimized.