Carding Forum
Professional
- Messages
- 2,788
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Points
- 113
Let's demystify the VbV/Non-VbV concept in the realm of payment processing and banking security. Contrary to popular belief, the efficacy of Verified by Visa (VbV) or non-VbV status isn't solely determined by the nature of the card itself. Instead, it hinges on the security protocols established by payment processors and individual bank branches.
The key to understanding this lies in the Bank Identification Number (BIN) associated with each card. The BIN provides critical information about the issuing bank and branch, as well as the card's level. Different card levels, such as Classic or Gold, may have various BINs assigned to them.
Now, here's the kicker: certain BINs perform better on specific websites due to their historical association with fraudulent activities. Payment processors and banks track these trends and may implement additional security measures, such as 3D Secure (VbV/MCSC), to counter potential fraud attempts.
However, it's important to note that the responsibility for setting up these security measures lies with individual bank branches. Within the confines of their institution, branches have the autonomy to configure security protocols tailored to each card level. This means that even cards of the same level, say Classic or Gold, may have distinct security configurations based on factors like the general setup and the account holder's specific security preferences at the time of card issuance.
To put it simply, there's no one-size-fits-all approach to VbV/Non-VbV authentication. The efficacy of these security measures depends on a multitude of factors, including BIN classification, historical fraud trends, and individual bank branch policies.
The key to understanding this lies in the Bank Identification Number (BIN) associated with each card. The BIN provides critical information about the issuing bank and branch, as well as the card's level. Different card levels, such as Classic or Gold, may have various BINs assigned to them.
Now, here's the kicker: certain BINs perform better on specific websites due to their historical association with fraudulent activities. Payment processors and banks track these trends and may implement additional security measures, such as 3D Secure (VbV/MCSC), to counter potential fraud attempts.
However, it's important to note that the responsibility for setting up these security measures lies with individual bank branches. Within the confines of their institution, branches have the autonomy to configure security protocols tailored to each card level. This means that even cards of the same level, say Classic or Gold, may have distinct security configurations based on factors like the general setup and the account holder's specific security preferences at the time of card issuance.
To put it simply, there's no one-size-fits-all approach to VbV/Non-VbV authentication. The efficacy of these security measures depends on a multitude of factors, including BIN classification, historical fraud trends, and individual bank branch policies.
Last edited: