Lord777
Professional
- Messages
- 2,579
- Reaction score
- 1,513
- Points
- 113
1. Minus for minus gives a plus.
Two unproven hypotheses can serve as "proof" of the truth of the Frick's theory. For example, the unproven hypothesis of the existence of intelligent alien life and the fact that the Egyptian pyramids were built using high technology, Freak presents as "evidence" that the pyramids were built by aliens. Likewise, one can “prove” the truth of dialectical materialism by invoking an unproven multiverse hypothesis or string theory.
The problem is that the phric way of thinking gradually replaces others, more adequate ones, and takes us into the jungle of permissiveness: "And you prove that I am wrong."
However, the burden of proof always rests with the approver.
If a person says that he is Napoleon, then it is he who must prove the truth of his statement. It is impossible to refute unfounded allegations, just as it is impossible to prove the non-existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or Russell's Kettle. Freaks take advantage of the illiteracy of the population, demanding from people to refute their fabrications, although they themselves cannot prove anything. Therefore, if you set about to argue with a freak, refute his arguments, and not the "theory" that has been sucked out of some unknown finger.
2. External similarity is more important than internal differences and vice versa.
Frick can find similar masonry in Egypt and South America, and on this basis conclude that they were created by the same civilization. This ignores differences in the tools used and construction methods.
Or, for example, similar hand positions in the images of Christ and Buddha are interpreted as evidence of the kinship of Christianity and Buddhism, while they are overlooked: 1) the meanings of these gestures, 2) the fact of the absence of lifetime portraits of Christ and Buddha, 3) data of comparative religious studies, which are not see a genetic relationship between these religions.
On the other hand, the external differences between ape and a man serve as proof for freaks that they have no common ancestors. At the same time , the data on the internal relationship of ape and humans, provided by genetics, anthropology, ethology, paleontology and other scientific disciplines, are ignored .
However, an elementary check shows that this "scientist" has nothing to do with science: he is unknown in the scientific world, he has no publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and his Hirsch index is zero. It is not surprising that in the English-language Wikipedia Michael Newton is in the category of Pseudoscientists, and the article about him was completely removed from the Russian Wikipedia due to its complete delusion. The debate over whether Michael Newton is a scientist or not is meaningless at all. Science, in principle, does not study the soul, therefore anyone who claims to be studying the human soul, by definition, cannot be a scientist. The phrases “I investigate the soul, therefore, I am a scientist” and “I collect stamps, therefore, I am a neurosurgeon” are equally meaningless.
3. Terminology determines eschatological transcendence in the quantum continuum of existential dispersion.
Freaks like to use words whose meanings are unknown to readers, or cause readers to associate them with something trustworthy, such as science. At the beginning of the 20th century, the word "electricity" was in vogue among freaks (electromagnetism, etc.), then it was replaced by the misunderstood term "energy" (energy is a mathematical expression of the movement of matter and nothing else ), and today freaks are happy to shove wherever it hits the word "quantum". In fact, a quantum is just an indivisible portion of some quantity, just as the term "freak" means an indivisible portion of planetary idiocy.
Even modern freaks like to refer to the "multidimensionality of space", but at the same time they "forget" to say that all objects in the Universe, for example, atoms, can exist only in three-dimensional physical space, and if other dimensions exist (what else needs to be proved), either exclusively in the "folded state", or as mathematical models.
The most notorious example of chaotic verbiage is demonstrated by librarian Antonio Meneghetti, acting under the nickname “professor”: “The discovery of the semantic field made it possible to discover the existence of a psychedelic computer that acts through photon specularity on local neural synapses in the brain; this distortion of information received through sensory channels imposes a fixed angle of view on synthetic (or passive) images, which is why subsequent rational reflection does not always develop a formula that exactly corresponds to the functional quantum. "(" A textbook on ontopsychology ") And other" astral programming of quantum computers "
4. The words of one fool do not prove that another is right.
Sometimes freaks show mercy to their followers and cite references in their texts to "scientific works" that "confirm" their correctness. Since most people are too lazy to google the name of another "great scientist who proved the existence of a soul in the seven-dimensional astral space", this cheap trick usually works. The rest quickly find out that the links of freaks lead either to nowhere, or to even bigger freaks - this is how a chain reaction arises in which a "freak-space continuum" arises.
A canonical example from Gregg Braden's book “The Divine Matrix”: “In the experiment of Poponin and Gariaev, the effect of DNA on light particles (photons), quantum bricks that make up everything in our world, was investigated. All the air was pumped out of the glass tube, creating an artificial vacuum in it. Using special sensors, scientists have identified the location of the photons in the tube. As expected, they randomly occupied all of her space. Then samples of human DNA were placed in the tube. And then the photons behaved in a completely unexpected way. It seemed that DNA, thanks to some invisible force, organizes them into ordered structures. "
To be honest, I was surprised that there are people who think that there is some meaning in this combination of words.
Firstly, “quantum kipichiks that make up everything in our world” are not photons, but quarks, but Braden is apparently too “smart” to look into some physics textbooks.
Secondly, photons moving at the speed of light, purely physically, cannot “randomly occupy space in the tube” or “take the form of DNA”, because the speed of light, as we remember, is approximately equal to 299 792 458 m / s without taking into account its absorption by matter.
Thirdly, Poponin and Gariaev are even bigger freaks than Braden and his feeble-minded, highly spiritual fans, and Peter Gariaev was awarded the title of freak not only in Freakopedia, but also in Wikipedia.
5. Inappropriate analogies.
Freaks try to compensate for the lack of knowledge by analogies: "Here a photon passes through two holes at the same time, so the thought is material." Or: "The universe is 90% dark matter and dark energy, so God exists." Or: "Today only powerful cranes can lift stones weighing 800 tons, therefore the Atlanteans built the pyramids." "Scientists have discovered the Higgs boson, which means everything in the universe is interconnected." Do not even try to find out from the freak in what logical way he came from the premise to the conclusion. For a freak it is obvious: “If Vasya drinks Pepsi-Cola, then Masha is pregnant from a Martian” (Because red!).
If you do not understand the connection, then your mind is limited by filters that prevent you from comprehending the holographic wisdom of the Universe. All this would be funny if it were not so sad, because freestyle, combined with the destruction of the education system, leads to the moronization of the population, which in the future may become irreversible.
Two unproven hypotheses can serve as "proof" of the truth of the Frick's theory. For example, the unproven hypothesis of the existence of intelligent alien life and the fact that the Egyptian pyramids were built using high technology, Freak presents as "evidence" that the pyramids were built by aliens. Likewise, one can “prove” the truth of dialectical materialism by invoking an unproven multiverse hypothesis or string theory.
The problem is that the phric way of thinking gradually replaces others, more adequate ones, and takes us into the jungle of permissiveness: "And you prove that I am wrong."
However, the burden of proof always rests with the approver.
If a person says that he is Napoleon, then it is he who must prove the truth of his statement. It is impossible to refute unfounded allegations, just as it is impossible to prove the non-existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or Russell's Kettle. Freaks take advantage of the illiteracy of the population, demanding from people to refute their fabrications, although they themselves cannot prove anything. Therefore, if you set about to argue with a freak, refute his arguments, and not the "theory" that has been sucked out of some unknown finger.
And remember: there is nothing worse than a dispute between two amateurs about issues in which they know nothing. In any case, it will be so as long as the opinion of a professional still has at least some value in the eyes of the public.
2. External similarity is more important than internal differences and vice versa.
Frick can find similar masonry in Egypt and South America, and on this basis conclude that they were created by the same civilization. This ignores differences in the tools used and construction methods.
Or, for example, similar hand positions in the images of Christ and Buddha are interpreted as evidence of the kinship of Christianity and Buddhism, while they are overlooked: 1) the meanings of these gestures, 2) the fact of the absence of lifetime portraits of Christ and Buddha, 3) data of comparative religious studies, which are not see a genetic relationship between these religions.
On the other hand, the external differences between ape and a man serve as proof for freaks that they have no common ancestors. At the same time , the data on the internal relationship of ape and humans, provided by genetics, anthropology, ethology, paleontology and other scientific disciplines, are ignored .
For example, some gullible citizens believe that the "proven soul" hypnotist Michael Newton is a real scientist, because it is written in the forewords to his books.
However, an elementary check shows that this "scientist" has nothing to do with science: he is unknown in the scientific world, he has no publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and his Hirsch index is zero. It is not surprising that in the English-language Wikipedia Michael Newton is in the category of Pseudoscientists, and the article about him was completely removed from the Russian Wikipedia due to its complete delusion. The debate over whether Michael Newton is a scientist or not is meaningless at all. Science, in principle, does not study the soul, therefore anyone who claims to be studying the human soul, by definition, cannot be a scientist. The phrases “I investigate the soul, therefore, I am a scientist” and “I collect stamps, therefore, I am a neurosurgeon” are equally meaningless.
3. Terminology determines eschatological transcendence in the quantum continuum of existential dispersion.
Freaks like to use words whose meanings are unknown to readers, or cause readers to associate them with something trustworthy, such as science. At the beginning of the 20th century, the word "electricity" was in vogue among freaks (electromagnetism, etc.), then it was replaced by the misunderstood term "energy" (energy is a mathematical expression of the movement of matter and nothing else ), and today freaks are happy to shove wherever it hits the word "quantum". In fact, a quantum is just an indivisible portion of some quantity, just as the term "freak" means an indivisible portion of planetary idiocy.
Even modern freaks like to refer to the "multidimensionality of space", but at the same time they "forget" to say that all objects in the Universe, for example, atoms, can exist only in three-dimensional physical space, and if other dimensions exist (what else needs to be proved), either exclusively in the "folded state", or as mathematical models.
The most notorious example of chaotic verbiage is demonstrated by librarian Antonio Meneghetti, acting under the nickname “professor”: “The discovery of the semantic field made it possible to discover the existence of a psychedelic computer that acts through photon specularity on local neural synapses in the brain; this distortion of information received through sensory channels imposes a fixed angle of view on synthetic (or passive) images, which is why subsequent rational reflection does not always develop a formula that exactly corresponds to the functional quantum. "(" A textbook on ontopsychology ") And other" astral programming of quantum computers "
4. The words of one fool do not prove that another is right.
Sometimes freaks show mercy to their followers and cite references in their texts to "scientific works" that "confirm" their correctness. Since most people are too lazy to google the name of another "great scientist who proved the existence of a soul in the seven-dimensional astral space", this cheap trick usually works. The rest quickly find out that the links of freaks lead either to nowhere, or to even bigger freaks - this is how a chain reaction arises in which a "freak-space continuum" arises.
A canonical example from Gregg Braden's book “The Divine Matrix”: “In the experiment of Poponin and Gariaev, the effect of DNA on light particles (photons), quantum bricks that make up everything in our world, was investigated. All the air was pumped out of the glass tube, creating an artificial vacuum in it. Using special sensors, scientists have identified the location of the photons in the tube. As expected, they randomly occupied all of her space. Then samples of human DNA were placed in the tube. And then the photons behaved in a completely unexpected way. It seemed that DNA, thanks to some invisible force, organizes them into ordered structures. "
To be honest, I was surprised that there are people who think that there is some meaning in this combination of words.
Firstly, “quantum kipichiks that make up everything in our world” are not photons, but quarks, but Braden is apparently too “smart” to look into some physics textbooks.
Secondly, photons moving at the speed of light, purely physically, cannot “randomly occupy space in the tube” or “take the form of DNA”, because the speed of light, as we remember, is approximately equal to 299 792 458 m / s without taking into account its absorption by matter.
Thirdly, Poponin and Gariaev are even bigger freaks than Braden and his feeble-minded, highly spiritual fans, and Peter Gariaev was awarded the title of freak not only in Freakopedia, but also in Wikipedia.
5. Inappropriate analogies.
Freaks try to compensate for the lack of knowledge by analogies: "Here a photon passes through two holes at the same time, so the thought is material." Or: "The universe is 90% dark matter and dark energy, so God exists." Or: "Today only powerful cranes can lift stones weighing 800 tons, therefore the Atlanteans built the pyramids." "Scientists have discovered the Higgs boson, which means everything in the universe is interconnected." Do not even try to find out from the freak in what logical way he came from the premise to the conclusion. For a freak it is obvious: “If Vasya drinks Pepsi-Cola, then Masha is pregnant from a Martian” (Because red!).
If you do not understand the connection, then your mind is limited by filters that prevent you from comprehending the holographic wisdom of the Universe. All this would be funny if it were not so sad, because freestyle, combined with the destruction of the education system, leads to the moronization of the population, which in the future may become irreversible.