"Cardable sites" lists are a staple in carding forums, Telegram channels, and dark web marketplaces. They claim to catalog online merchants with perceived weaker fraud controls — specifically those that do not consistently enforce 3D Secure (3DS/VBV/MCSC), OTP/biometric step-up, strict velocity monitoring, or advanced behavioral AI on every transaction. These lists are marketed as "updated for 2026" with categories like non-VBV, high-approval, instant digital delivery, and testing-friendly sites.
In reality, reliable, long-term cardable sites are virtually nonexistent in 2026. The combination of network tokenization, risk-based authentication, processor data-sharing (Stripe/Adyen/Braintree), and merchant adoption of ML tools (similar to SageMaker models) has made sustained exploitation of major or mid-sized sites impractical. Lists circulate primarily as promotional tools for CC shops — driving sales of "matching BINs" — and contain a mix of outdated, patched, or intentionally misleading entries. True vulnerabilities are short-lived (days/weeks) before upgrades or blacklisting.
Success rates on claimed sites: Typically <30-50% even with fresh non-VBV BINs and perfect geo-match; many decline or cancel post-order.
Sources often charge for "premium" lists or bundle with CC sales.
Consumers/merchants benefit: Lower fraud = better prices, fewer chargebacks.
2025–2026 Outlook: As agentic AI and embedded payments grow, "cardable" windows shrink further. Lists will continue circulating but with diminishing real utility — more marketing than substance.
In reality, reliable, long-term cardable sites are virtually nonexistent in 2026. The combination of network tokenization, risk-based authentication, processor data-sharing (Stripe/Adyen/Braintree), and merchant adoption of ML tools (similar to SageMaker models) has made sustained exploitation of major or mid-sized sites impractical. Lists circulate primarily as promotional tools for CC shops — driving sales of "matching BINs" — and contain a mix of outdated, patched, or intentionally misleading entries. True vulnerabilities are short-lived (days/weeks) before upgrades or blacklisting.
Why "Cardable" Lists Are Largely Obsolete in 2026
- Widespread Risk-Based 3DS Adoption: PSD2 in EU/UK, similar regs globally, and processor policies mean even "non-VBV" sites trigger challenges on anomalies (geo mismatch, velocity, new device).
- Tokenization Impact: Network tokens replace PANs in wallets — stolen raw data useless on modern checkouts.
- Behavioral & Velocity AI: Merchants flag "warming" (small tests → large purchase) or robotic patterns instantly.
- Data-Sharing Consortia: Failed attempts on one site propagate to others.
- Merchant Upgrades: Independent stores (Shopify/WooCommerce) increasingly add FraudFilter apps or switch to stricter processors.
- Scam Integration: Lists often link to ripper shops or contain honeypots.
Success rates on claimed sites: Typically <30-50% even with fresh non-VBV BINs and perfect geo-match; many decline or cancel post-order.
Common Categories in 2026 Lists (Aggregated from Monitored Sources)
These are generalized from forum threads (Carder.su, 2crd, CrdPro, CraxVault) and blogs — highly volatile, often patched:- Gift Cards & Crypto Top-Ups(Most Promoted – Instant Delivery)
- Sites like Cryptovoucher.io, Eneba gift sections, Bitrefill, Coinsbee, G2A Pay variants.
- Reason claimed: Low initial friction, codes delivered instantly.
- Reality: Heavy post-purchase review; codes revoked if flagged.
- Gaming & Digital Goods
- Kinguin, CDKeys, G2A (selective), OffGamers, SEAGM, Lootbar.
- Steam/Wallet codes, in-game currency resellers.
- Reason: Digital = no shipping risk.
- Reality: Tencent/Valve/Blizzard share fraud signals; bans common.
- Clothing/Fashion & General Merchandise
- Small-mid Shopify stores (regional brands, dropshipping outlets).
- ASOS/Hollister variants (inconsistent), FashionNova clones.
- Reason: Lower automated scrutiny on fashion categories.
- Electronics & Tech (High-Risk/High-Reward Claims)
- Adorama, B&H Photo (selective), Newegg regional, Tomtop, Gearbest remnants.
- Australian sites like Techbuy, Kogan.
- Reason: High-value items.
- Reality: Strict category monitoring; signature/hold common.
- Testing & Low-Risk Sites
- Charity/donation pages (various non-profits).
- Small subscription trials (VPNs, streaming).
- Reason: $1-10 auth-only.
Typical "2026 Updated" List Structure (Example Format from Sources)
- Non-VBV/High Approval: 20-50 sites with notes (e.g., "US BINs only," "digital instant," "no OTP under $100").
- BIN Recommendations: Specific issuers/banks claimed to bypass (small regional, debit preferred).
- OPSEC Notes: "Use residential SOCKS exact state," "warm with $5 first," "antidetect mandatory."
Sources often charge for "premium" lists or bundle with CC sales.
Risks and Scam Elements in These Lists
- Promotional Bait: Designed to sell matching "fresh non-VBV BINs" (often dead/refunded).
- Honeypots & Tracing: Some sites cooperate with issuers or are monitored.
- Rapid Obsolescence: A "working" site in January patched by March.
- Internal Scams: Links to ripper shops or malware download "tools."
Cardable Merchant Perspective & Defenses
Merchants in 2026 prioritize:- Shopify Fraud Filter, Signifyd, Kount, or processor tools.
- Risk-based 3DS exemptions only for trusted flows.
- Post-order manual review for high-value.
Consumers/merchants benefit: Lower fraud = better prices, fewer chargebacks.
2025–2026 Outlook: As agentic AI and embedded payments grow, "cardable" windows shrink further. Lists will continue circulating but with diminishing real utility — more marketing than substance.
Last edited by a moderator:
