Can it be true?
- Thread starter saniok1
- Start date
Are you f*in serious ? Of course it's not true. Every code (for everything) follows a simple generating and verification procedure. Imagine a credit card number - it follows a simple algorithm so even offline you can see if certain number CAN be a correct CC number or not. But not every CORRECT CC number is actually VALID, ACTIVE and contains any money in its account.
Same is with the moneypak codes. Some dude might have guessed how the numbers are generated (they are not random for sure) but the numbers that have actual balance are not just algo of a number - it is like an account, If moneypack checked only if the algorithm that made the number is correct 1 number should work infinite times, but it doesnt!
This thing COULD work if you generate lots and lots of codes and try them 1 by 1. At some point you could get a valid code, but with many tryouts. Or if it had an "extrapolate" option - if you have a fresh valid voucher number you could find other numbers from the same batch. But actually I think the author is just trying to rip or to give you a nice trojan
Same is with the moneypak codes. Some dude might have guessed how the numbers are generated (they are not random for sure) but the numbers that have actual balance are not just algo of a number - it is like an account, If moneypack checked only if the algorithm that made the number is correct 1 number should work infinite times, but it doesnt!
This thing COULD work if you generate lots and lots of codes and try them 1 by 1. At some point you could get a valid code, but with many tryouts. Or if it had an "extrapolate" option - if you have a fresh valid voucher number you could find other numbers from the same batch. But actually I think the author is just trying to rip or to give you a nice trojan
Similar threads
