Recent content by ricky neutron

Not last year, about 3 years ago

isnt 911.re down?

Guys, I decided to do some carding today and upon selecting 10 proxies from 922s5, I did my checks and realized 10 out of 10 proxies selected are all bad for carding. If I'm to use these proxies to card I will definitely get my orders cancelled for sure. Newbies please don't think carding is...

Guys i wont be mentoring or teaching newbies how to card anymore. I leave that to other professionals on the forum. Anybody looking to do business with me can contact me here or on telegram( for faster reply).. One important tip I'm giving newbies is to avoid anti-detect browsers. Any pro who...

item delivered!!!!!

Item shipped!!!!:cool:

This order was place earlier this month when the forum was down

avoid vbv bin cards and always hit with clean ip. And also try to use clean unblacklisted residential ips not datacenter ones. GOODLUCK!!!

this makes no sense at all. you just confusing newbies. and what screenshots are you talking about? your recent hits? and wtf u mean by if you don't have enough money pos switch to 3d. lol we all know without funds u get straight decline. Even noobs know this.

check ip (vpn/proxy) used to card. use this sites scamalytics.com, ipqualityscore.com, whoer.net, etc. and check your actual ip too on these sites and you would atleast have a clue why your orders get cancelled

with all due respect may i know when you started your carding journey?

you are not entirely true and im not assuming. if there is no balance on card payment will decline and if card is dead you get a response like incorrect billing info. if there is enough funds or card isnt dead order goes through but due to your wrong setup is when order get cancelled because...

that telegram group is full of newbies and full of unnecessary carding information. its better to learn from this forum

This has nothing to do with changing your cc seller as cc did its job since it confirmed order. the problem is in your setup and proxy selection. 100% fact not assuming